Better Elections for LA

Proportional Ranked Choice Voting can transform LA's democracy by ensuring every community gets a seat at the table

Join the Movement

Why Reform Is Needed Now

👥

Severe Underrepresentation

Los Angeles has the worst per-capita city council representation in the nation: over 260,000 residents per councilmember, compared to about 160,000 in New York City and 54,000 in Chicago. With just 15 council members serving nearly four million residents, entire communities are left without a meaningful voice at City Hall.

⚖️

Zero-Sum Politics

The 2022 Federation Tapes scandal exposed how single-seat, winner-take-all districts pit Black, Latino, Asian-Pacific Islander, and White communities against each other in a zero-sum struggle for political power. One community wins a seat, others are left out entirely. Even with a larger council of 25 or 33 members, it would still be impossible to draw proportional single-member districts that fairly represent API and Black populations.

🗳️

Low Turnout and Inequity

Since 2020, nearly 60% of council races have been decided in primaries, where turnout is lower and less diverse than in general elections. In 2024, White voters made up 48% of primary voters despite being only 32% of the voting population, while the share of Latino voters was significantly less compared to the general election. This is effectively a voting rights issue.

💸

Wasted Votes

In Los Angeles' current system, 30–49% of votes are wasted—they do not help elect anyone. Vote-splitting confuses voters and discourages strong candidates from running. Candidates must campaign twice, burning through resources, while voters face decision fatigue.

🔒

Corruption and Distrust

Single-seat districts create political fiefdoms where councilmembers act as the "boss" of their district. Between 2020 and 2024, three councilmembers were jailed and another was indicted on felony charges. Concentrated power in single-member districts creates environments where accountability is weak and corruption flourishes.

📊

Insufficient Reforms

The creation of an Independent Redistricting Commission was a necessary step, but it does not change the underlying zero-sum dynamic of single-member districts. Redistricting will always leave winners and losers. Only PRCV can transform the structure of representation to match LA's diversity.

The Solution: Proportional Ranked Choice Voting

Proportional Ranked Choice Voting (PRCV) is a proven election method for multi-seat districts that combines City Council expansion with multi-seat districts to ensure all of LA's communities get fair representation.

How PRCV Works

Simple for voters: Rank candidates in order of preference—first choice, second choice, third choice. That's it. The ballot looks familiar: the same ranked-choice format already used in multiple California cities.

Multiple winners per district: In a three-seat district, the threshold to win is 25% + 1 vote. This allows diverse communities to each elect representatives who reflect their values.

Votes transfer automatically: Once a candidate meets the threshold, their surplus votes are transferred to voters' next preferences. Candidates with the fewest votes are eliminated, and their votes also transfer. This continues until all seats are filled.

Your vote counts: If your first choice can't win, your vote automatically transfers to your next choice. Nearly every voter helps elect a candidate they support.

No vote-splitting: By eliminating vote-splitting, PRCV allows voters to rank true preferences without fear of helping elect someone they oppose.

Better campaigns: Candidates have incentives to campaign positively and appeal beyond their base to earn second- and third-choice votes, building coalitions instead of tearing each other down.

Watch: How Proportional Ranked Choice Voting Works

Video by More Equitable Democracy

Benefits of PRCV for Los Angeles

1. Fairer Representation

PRCV allows diverse communities to win seats in proportion to their share of the population. With three-seat PRCV districts, every major community can win representation within each district. Asian-Pacific Islander and Black communities would have realistic paths to proportional representation citywide—impossible with single-seat districts even at 45 members. The City Council would more accurately reflect the diversity of the voters than under LA's current electoral system.

2. Voter Empowerment

PRCV maximizes the number of effective votes. Instead of 30-49% of votes going to losing candidates under LA's current system, PRCV ensures most voters help elect someone they ranked. In Portland's 2024 PRCV election, 87% of voters helped elect at least one candidate.

3. Stronger Campaigns and Coalitions

Candidates have incentives to campaign positively and appeal beyond their base to earn second- and third-choice votes. In New York City and San Francisco, candidates formed alliances and encouraged voters to rank them together—building coalitions instead of tearing each other down. Instead of pitting different communities against each other for single-seat representation, PRCV elections give more of LA's diversity a proportional seat at the table within each district and citywide, de-escalating the zero-sum, divisive consequences of LA's redistricting process.

4. Cost Savings

For the City: One election instead of two saves millions. LA spends millions running two rounds of elections—primaries in spring and runoffs in November. With PRCV, everything is decided in one high-turnout general election. Money saved can go to services Angelenos actually need—housing, safety, infrastructure.

For Candidates: Campaigning is less expensive when there is only one election. Candidates can spend more time talking to voters and less time fundraising.

For Public Financing: Matching funds go further, reducing strain on LA's trust fund. With PRCV, campaigns are funded once, not twice. This complements public financing by giving everyday Angelenos more voice in campaigns and reducing influence of big donors.

5. Accountability and Trust

Diffuses power: Multiple representatives per district prevent concentration of authority and reduce opportunities for corruption.

Ends lame duck problem: Incumbents who lose do not linger for 6–8 months after being rejected by voters.

Increases inclusion: Strong candidates can run without political gatekeepers telling them to "wait their turn." Women and candidates of color are no longer treated as "spoilers." Research shows RCV helps elect more women and candidates of color.

6. Higher Turnout, More Diverse Electorate

All winners decided in November general elections when turnout is highest and voter demographics better reflect LA's true diversity—not in primaries where one demographic group dominates. This solves the low-turnout primary issue and increases voter participation.

7. Less Contentious Redistricting

Because multiple communities can win representation within each district, redistricting becomes far less contentious. Different line-drawing approaches produce similar results, eliminating the zero-sum battles that plague single-seat redistricting.

8. Increased Voter Confidence

Voters can vote their conscience and express their preferences on a ranked ballot without strategic voting or fear of wasting their vote. Over 80% of voters in Portland elected a winning candidate they ranked, compared to potentially 49.9% who don't help elect anyone in a divided single-seat race.

A Proven System

PRCV isn't experimental—it's time-tested and voter-approved:

  • Portland, Oregon (2024): First major U.S. city to implement PRCV. In its inaugural election, 87% of voters successfully elected at least one candidate they ranked.
  • New York City (2021–2025): Uses single-winner RCV for mayoral and council races. 96% of voters reported their ballot was easy to use.
  • Global Use: Ireland, Scotland, Australia, and New Zealand all elect legislatures with PRCV. Over 50 jurisdictions have RCV in place for all voters in public elections, with over 20 million votes cast since 2004.
  • California: 27 cities and counties have adopted ranked choice voting.
  • Why PRCV is ideal for LA: PRCV is the best system of proportional representation for LA city elections because LA's elections are non-partisan. Candidates do not run with party affiliations listed on the ballot. PRCV allows voters to rank as many candidates as they would like, ensuring that the broadest set of voices is reflected in the outcome.

Get Involved

The LA Charter Reform Commission has until April 2026 to make recommendations. The City Council then decides whether to place PRCV on the November 2026 ballot. Your voice matters now.

✉️

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive updates about public comment opportunities, Charter Reform Commission meetings, and volunteer opportunities.

We'll keep you informed about key moments in the campaign

🤝

Organizations: Endorse PRCV

Is your community organization, union, or advocacy group interested in learning more about PRCV and potentially endorsing it for Los Angeles?

Learn More & Endorse

Join the coalition working for fair representation

💵

Support the Campaign

Help us build the movement for better representation in Los Angeles. Every contribution makes a difference.

Donate Now

Individual and foundation contributions welcome

Implementation Timeline

📅

Now - April 2026

Charter Reform Commission continues study of PRCV as part of council expansion and deliberates on recommendations

📝

April 2026

Charter Reform Commission submits recommendations to City Council

🗳️

July 2026

City Council decides whether to place PRCV measure on ballot

November 2026

Voters approve PRCV and council expansion

⚙️

2027–2030

LA County adds PRCV capability to its voting system. VSAP voting system can be updated to accommodate ranked ballots

📚

2030–2031

Public education and redistricting process

🎉

2032

First LA City Council elections under PRCV

Updates & Resources

About Us

We are a coalition of Los Angeles residents, community organizations, and reform advocates working to bring Proportional Ranked Choice Voting to Los Angeles.

Our Mission

To persuade the Los Angeles Charter Reform Commission and City Council to place Proportional Ranked Choice Voting on the ballot, giving LA voters the opportunity to create a more representative, accountable, and inclusive city government.

Why Now?

Los Angeles is at a crossroads. The 2022 Federation Tapes scandal and subsequent corruption convictions of multiple councilmembers exposed how the current system pits communities against one another in a zero-sum struggle for political power, and provides incentives for councilmembers as the "boss" of their own council district fiefdom to engage in criminal behavior.

The Charter Reform Commission was established after this scandal exposed deep flaws in LA's election system. While the creation of an Independent Redistricting Commission was an important step, it doesn't address the fundamental problem: winner-take-all elections that pit communities against each other.

The Commission has until April 2026 to make recommendations. This is our rare opportunity to restore trust in our democracy and lead the nation in fair representation—to transform LA's democracy for generations to come.

Our Partners

This effort works hand-in-hand with the Fair Representation Los Angeles Coalition, which advocates for City Council expansion. PRCV and expansion together create a system where more Angelenos have effective representation.

We're grateful for research and analysis from the California Ranked Choice Voting Institute (CalRCV), More Equitable Democracy, the Green Party of Los Angeles County, and other organizations committed to electoral reform.

Contact Us

Email: info@betterelectionsla.org

For Commissioners, Elected Officials & Media

We welcome the opportunity to present detailed information about PRCV, answer questions, and discuss implementation. We can provide:

  • Presentations to community groups and organizations
  • In-depth briefings on PRCV mechanics and outcomes
  • Detailed analysis and research
  • Demographic analysis and mapping data
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Case studies from Portland, New York, and other jurisdictions
  • Q&A sessions
  • Materials for your members or constituents

Please reach out to schedule a conversation.